Inventors and Patents From the City of Gilbert
Inventors from Gilbert have been granted patents for a variety of inventions. In December alone, six Gilbert inventions were granted patents. The longest period between filing a patent application and the grant date was 1,784 days. A patent is not a guarantee of success, however.
Kearns’ intermittent wiper
The intermittent wiper was the brainchild of Robert Kearns. It was a way to deal with the problem of intermittent precipitation on the windshield. Kearns initially pitched the invention to the Big Three automakers but was unsuccessful in getting them to license the idea. As a result, the company started to make cars with intermittent wipers.
Robert Kearns was born in River Rouge, Mich., and was an engineer at the National Bureau of Standards. His idea was to make the wiper act more like an eyelid. This idea was eventually implemented in the intermittent windshield wiper, which has been around for decades. Today, most cars have the wiper.
The auto industry argued that Kearns’ invention was not patentable because it had no new components. However, he noted that the system he had invented was novel. And he cited previous Supreme Court precedent for his argument. Ultimately, Ford and Kearns settled for $10.2 million.
Kearns’ invention began in the 17th century. In the 18th century, an Englishman named John Kearns invented a similar device. However, he did not patent the device. It is now patent-eligible. However, the patent has not been issued, because Kearns lacked the legal expertise to protect his invention.
The intermittent wiper system is an improvement over continuous operation. It uses a windstream against the windshield to dissipate moisture and dry vision. The intermittent operation also prolongs the life of the wiper blades, motor and linkages. The moisture that accumulates in the evaporating windstream acts as lubricant for the wipers, making them last longer.
Henry Ford’s Selden case
Henry Ford was a wealthy man who could afford to pay the royalties and current royalties. However, he didn’t. He was not willing to cede his rights to the patent. He supported his legal team in filing an appeal. He was joined by a French company to oppose the ruling. The French company also demanded that all car importers license the patent. Unfortunately, the appeal was delayed because the Electric Vehicle Company went bankrupt. As a result, the patent was eventually assigned to another firm.
The Selden patent described a car that could run for a couple thousand yards. While his later associates argued that this patent covered all gasoline-powered cars, the truth is that Selden’s patent was useless. He never used the engine he showed in his patent drawing on a commercial car.
Henry Selden’s elder brother, Samuel L. Selden, was a prominent figure in the early commercial telegraphy in western New York. His father died when Henry was fifteen, and he was educated at local institutions. After he became a lawyer, he was appointed as a member of the New York and Mississippi Valley Telegraph Co., which later became the Western Union Telegraph Company.
Ford’s interests were wide-ranging. He became famous for his achievements and became very wealthy. He was an avid advocate of pacifism prior to World War I, and he supported the anti-preparedness movement in 1916. However, he turned to a “fighting pacifist” after World War I and built military vehicles and engines. He also contributed to the government’s Liberty Loan program and to the war effort.
Gilbert Hyatt’s inventions
In the early 1960s, electrical engineer Gilbert P. Hyatt went back to school and received his master’s degree. After working as a research engineer for Teledyne, he decided to form his own company. There, he developed the idea of shrinking computer technology to fit on a single chip. This device became known as a “microcomputer,” which was a breakthrough in computer technology at the time.
Hyatt’s inventions, which involved microprocessors, made him very wealthy. But he moved to Nevada after realizing that he had to pay taxes in California. The case went to the US Supreme Court twice, and is still pending in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. But the case was mostly settled yesterday, during a hearing before the California Board of Equalization.
Hyatt’s inventions have helped fuel the evolution of technology. The microprocessor is one of the most important parts of modern technology. Since the 1970s, he’s obtained over 70 patents for his inventions. His single-chip microcomputer, for example, has been licensed by numerous companies and is now a major component of many products. But his patents have been challenged by former Intel Corp. researchers, who claim Hyatt was not the first to invent the microprocessor.
Hyatt’s lawsuit against the PTO was unsuccessful in the first round of appeals, despite the fact that the PTO has a strict policy prohibiting applicants from claiming patents for their inventions without being able to prove market acceptance. Hyatt’s attorneys have filed an administrative procedure act suit, asking for review under Section 706(1) and 706(2).
Inventors and Patents
Alfred Carlton Gilbert was a multi-talented inventor who chose to educate people through toys. Born in Salem, Oregon in 1884, he enjoyed performing magic tricks as a child. He once matched a traveling professional magician trick for trick, earning praise from his mother. He also discovered his athletic ability at a young age, becoming a football star in college.
Inventors in Gilbert had the longest time between filing a patent and its grant: 2,203 days in April. Allen Wright’s patent, for atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment, was approved on April 19. While inventors are required to obtain patents before selling their products, a patent does not guarantee success. According to Dennis Crouch, co-director of the Center for Intellectual Property & Entrepreneurship, roughly 50 percent of patents do not survive due to the costs associated with filing and maintaining the patents.
The Tet offensive in Vietnam was killing thousands of people. Russian tanks rumbled into the Czech Republic. Presidents Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. were assassinated. Meanwhile, Gilbert P. Hyatt, an electrical engineer, was obsessed with designing a computer microchip. He was just 24 years old at the time.
Despite the growing number of female inventors, only 13 percent of them are female. Women are much less likely to be named inventors than men, with just four patents awarded to women. It is also important to know the story behind the invention. After all, a patent can protect a concept only if the creators have a background in the field.
The first of the many inventions associated with Gilbert came from his childhood. As a child, Gilbert attended St. Mary’s Convent in Chicago. Her father, Horace Gilbert, was a Catholic priest and taught her to read. She later created a library and started the Gilbert Library and Prisoners’ Aid Fund. She also helped inmates in prisons by visiting them and bringing them books and letters. She also helped them get jobs and clothing.
Doctrine of nonobviousness
A nonobvious invention is one that is not obvious to a person with a background in the particular field in which it is claimed. The nonobviousness principle focuses on whether the invention has a sufficient distance from the state of the art. This standard requires judgment. It does not necessarily apply to all types of inventions.
The benefits of an invention are an important consideration in patent law. While markets are supposed to assess the benefits of an invention, courts sometimes consider them in the application of various doctrines, such as nonobviousness and eligibility. While this can be a helpful tool in assessing an invention, it can also magnify any negative aspects of it.
The doctrine of nonobviousness is one of the four traditional requirements for patents. The others are novelty, usefulness, and enablement. These principles help ensure that a patent monopoly is only granted to true and novel inventions. The novelty standard asks whether a given invention has been previously described and examines its references to determine whether it is a new and inventive idea.
Hunt and O’Donoghue have both attempted to examine the doctrine of nonobviousness. These two studies assume that a given invention has been subjected to R & D. In this way, it is not obvious to the market until the next invention is patented. The result is that the dominant market position continues until a new invention comes along and takes its place. The models also show that the dynamic benefits outweigh the static costs.